My father used the expression “and that’s how that is.” Saying those words was marking acceptance of a situation for what it was, and not for what he or others hoped it would be. Perhaps an object had been broken, or there was unexpected bad news. In reaction to the event he could be sad, angry, confused, or what have you; yet, at the same time he accepted the reality of the situation.
What brings the phrase to mind is the lack of honesty of that portion of the recent G7 declaration focusing on climate change (see my last blog post). One can be shocked, or angry, or aghast, or dispirited—any of these feelings seem appropriate—but the likelihood is that none of the emotions will change the declaration, its successor statements from the G7, or the inadequate steps that may be agreed upon at the Paris climate summit late this year.
There have been many watershed moments in our understanding of climate change during the past 50 years, including publication of The Limits to Growth more than 40 years ago, release of five IPCC reports over a period of nearly a quarter-century, and Pope Francis’s recent encyclical about climate change. We can add the G7 declaration as another watershed moment, when leaders of the Western world, plus Japan, failed to be honest about climate change, representing in their official declaration the idea that global temperature increases can be held to less than 2° C more cheaply and easily than experts believe possible.
It is true that the G7 leaders have been dealt a difficult, if not impossible, hand. Apathy, ignorance, pessimism, a well-funded opposition, and other factors make combating climate change a formidable problem. Most people do not want to hear the truth and would not believe it if they did. However, the difficulty of conveying hard truths does not make it right for the G7 leaders to issue a declaration that puts a far-too-happy face on a dire situation.
What is more, there is a déjà vu quality about the recent G7 meeting because it reminds one of other climate meetings that failed to produce what the world’s experts say is needed. Focusing in particular on the 2009 meeting in Copenhagen Marcus Brigstocke, an English comedian, wrote a poem about the climate summit in the style of Dr. Seuss, the last portion of which reads:
“And they blew it, and wasted the greatest of chances
Instead they all frolicked in diplomat dances
And decided decisively, right there and then
The best way to solve it’s to meet up again
And decide on a future that’s greener and greater
Not with action right now but with something else later.”
Humor aside, it may be difficult for many people to process feelings about the lack of honesty in the G7 declaration. Nonetheless, adopting the phrase my father used: And that’s how that is (and how it has been for years).